Relaunched 2026
A curated, not-for-profit publishing platform. Advanced Materials Letters publishes by invitation — articles from IAAM Fellows, awardees and collaborating institutions — with reading access through IAAM membership and subscription. Authors are never charged a fee.
See the access model →

Ethics & Process

Our commitment to ethical publishing practices and transparent peer review processes ensures the integrity and quality of all published research.

Publication Ethics

Advanced Materials Letters is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics. We follow the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and ensure that all stakeholders understand their ethical responsibilities.

Author Responsibilities

Submit only original, unpublished work
Provide accurate and complete citations
Disclose any conflicts of interest
Ensure proper authorship attribution
Report research methods and results honestly

Editor Responsibilities

Maintain confidentiality during review
Make fair and unbiased decisions
Handle misconduct allegations properly
Protect reviewer and author identities
Ensure timely review processes

Peer Review Process

Our rigorous double-blind peer review process ensures the quality and integrity of published research. All manuscripts undergo comprehensive evaluation by international experts in the relevant field.

1
Initial Editorial Assessment
3-5 days

Manuscripts are checked for scope, quality, and technical merit by the editorial team.

2
Reviewer Assignment
5-7 days

Qualified reviewers are identified and invited based on expertise and availability.

3
Peer Review
4-6 weeks

Expert reviewers conduct thorough evaluation and provide detailed feedback.

4
Editorial Decision
1-2 weeks

Editors review feedback and make final publication decisions.

5
Author Revision
2-4 weeks

Authors address reviewer comments and revise their manuscript as needed.

6
Final Acceptance
1-2 weeks

Final review of revisions and preparation for publication.

Handling Research Misconduct

We take allegations of research misconduct seriously and follow established procedures to investigate and address any concerns about published content.

Plagiarism

Unauthorized use of others’ work without proper attribution

Immediate investigation and potential retraction
Data Fabrication

Making up data or results that were never obtained

Full investigation with institutional collaboration
Duplicate Publication

Publishing the same research in multiple venues

Editorial notice and correction procedures

Ethics Standards

COPE Member
Verified

We are committed to COPE's best practices and guidelines for ethical publishing.

CrossRef Member
Active

All articles receive CrossRef DOIs for permanent identification and citation tracking.

International Standards
Compliant

Adherence to international ethics guidelines and best practices.

Report Concerns

If you have concerns about published content or the review process, please contact us:

Ethics Inquiries

[email protected]

Editorial Office

[email protected]

Typical Timeline

Initial Review3-5 days
Peer Review4-6 weeks
First Decision6-8 weeks
Final Decision8-12 weeks

Reviewer Program

We recognize and appreciate our reviewers' contributions through:

Annual recognition certificates
Reviewer database profiles
Outstanding reviewer awards